Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391398›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Beyond native sequence recovery: Improved modeling of the sequence-energy landscape of protein structures.

Foster Birnbaum, Amy E Keating

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Foster BirnbaumDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-6062-2296
Amy E KeatingDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0003-4074-8980

Funding

Computational and Experimental Investigation and Design of Protein Interaction SpecificityR35GM149227 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AMY E KEATING · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) 5 R35GM149227-03NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM149227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational protein design using machine learning models has advanced rapidly since the introduction of AlphaFold2. There is now a suite of tools that enable in silico design of proteins with desired structures and properties. Most design workflows require fitting a designed backbone with a sequence that stabilizes it, and many machine learning sequence design models have been proposed. These models are trained to recover the native sequence paired with a known structure, a task known as native sequence recovery (NSR). Here, we demonstrate the limitations of optimizing a sequence design model only for NSR. We show that NSR is often misaligned with more important metrics of model performance: the compatibility of the generated sequence with the desired fold and the ability of the model to predict the energetic effects of mutations. We introduce PottsMPNN, which is trained to generate a Potts energy function consisting of single-residue and residue-pair terms from a protein backbone, and we demonstrate that learning a Potts model reduces NSR but improves sequence generation and energy prediction. We also trained PottsMPNN with noised backbone structures and multiple sequence alignments. In tests on held-out data, NSR decreased, but the quality of the designed sequences and energy predictions improved. By demonstrating the limitations of optimizing for NSR and the effectiveness of strategies that avoid NSR overoptimization, our work advances sequence design and highlights future directions for the broader protein design field.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProteinsAmino Acid SequenceMachine LearningModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProtein FoldingProteinsdeep learningprotein designsequence designsequence–structure compatibilitystability prediction

Identifiers

PMID42391398
PMCPMC13342849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.