Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391336›Full record

ArticleEthics & human research

Organ Chips and Translational Research: Identifying and Examining New Ethical Issues.

Melanie Jeske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethics & human research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Melanie JeskeAssistant professor in the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ chips, also known as organ-on-a-chip devices, tissue chips, or microphysiological systems, have emerged over the last decade as a promising translational technology amidst growing concern about the translational crisis between laboratory research and patient bedside. Pointing to high rates of failure between nonhuman animal models and safety and efficacy in humans, organ chips and similar new approach methods have attracted substantial public and private investment. As human-cell-based alternatives to animal models, organ chips promise more predictive, efficient, and ethical platforms for pharmaceutical and toxicity testing. Engineered cultivation systems that enable cells to assemble into tissue-like structures (e.g. kidney, brain, liver), organ chips mimic tissue architecture and function and live for extended periods of time. This essay considers the translational bioethics issues raised by organ chips, including those that arise early in development such as the obfuscation of cell-origin data, representation in design, and the normalization of conflicts of interest within commercialization-oriented translational science efforts. Integrating a translational bioethics lens from the outset, rather than deferring social and ethical implications analysis to downstream points in technology development and adoption, is essential to realizing the translational promise of organ chips while avoiding the reproduction of existing inequities and ethical conundrums.

Indexed as

Bioethical IssuesLab-On-A-Chip DevicesTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansMicrophysiological Systemsanimal modelsconflicts of interestFDA Modernization Act 2.0human‐based research technologieshuman donor datainduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)new approach methodologies (NAMs)organ‐on‐a‐chip technologies

Identifiers

PMID42391336
PMCPMC13327176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.