Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391275›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

"Shining a light on chronic pain": A qualitative study of stakeholder views towards chronic pain at work and the Pain-at-Work Toolkit.

Angela Claire Thornton, Elaine Wainwright, Wendy J Chaplin, Victoria Abbott-Fleming, Daniel F McWilliams, David A Walsh, Gordon Taylor, Paul McNamee, Karen Walker-Bone, Holly Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Angela Claire ThorntonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1194-5344
Elaine WainwrightAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Wendy J ChaplinSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Victoria Abbott-FlemingBritish Pain Society, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel F McWilliamsSchool of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0581-1895
David A WalshNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Gordon TaylorCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1715-0913
Paul McNameeHealth Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Karen Walker-BoneMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Monash University, Australia.
Holly BlakeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3080-2306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study explored the views of organisational stakeholders who participated in the feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit towards the implementation of the toolkit in 'real-world' workplace settings. This digital toolkit was co-created with healthcare professionals, employers, and people with chronic pain and aimed to inform and enable individuals to self-manage their chronic pain at work. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 15 stakeholders from 12 organisations that participated in a feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the inclusion of stakeholders with management or supportive roles who have responsibility for the health and wellbeing of employees.

findingsThe findings illuminate three key themes: not all disabilities are visible; not all line managers are equal; and who has control? These surmise that invisible disabilities such as chronic pain are underestimated, poorly understood, and inconsistently provisioned for in organisational policies. It highlights the key role that line managers play in employee disclosure and access to support but demonstrates that line managers vary in their delivery of support to employees. Lastly, it explores stakeholder perceptions of the roles of the employer relative to the employee with chronic pain. It confirms the need for additional resources to plug organisational gaps and give workers tools to self-manage their pain at work. ORIGINALITY: This study indicates the need for resources / supports to upskill line managers so they can intervene to proactively support employees with chronic pain to reduce sickness absence and presenteeism (working when unwell). The research demonstrates organisational stakeholders' interest in a multi-faceted approach to help employees self-manage chronic pain in all types at work, such as that provided by the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. In addition, it clearly identifies the potential for complementary resources to educate and facilitate line managers to better support their staff.

Indexed as

Chronic PainStakeholder ParticipationWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchWorking Conditions

Identifiers

PMID42391275
PMCPMC13327183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.