ArticlePloS one2026
"Shining a light on chronic pain": A qualitative study of stakeholder views towards chronic pain at work and the Pain-at-Work Toolkit.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study explored the views of organisational stakeholders who participated in the feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit towards the implementation of the toolkit in 'real-world' workplace settings. This digital toolkit was co-created with healthcare professionals, employers, and people with chronic pain and aimed to inform and enable individuals to self-manage their chronic pain at work. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 15 stakeholders from 12 organisations that participated in a feasibility trial of the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. Purposive sampling was used to ensure the inclusion of stakeholders with management or supportive roles who have responsibility for the health and wellbeing of employees.
findingsThe findings illuminate three key themes: not all disabilities are visible; not all line managers are equal; and who has control? These surmise that invisible disabilities such as chronic pain are underestimated, poorly understood, and inconsistently provisioned for in organisational policies. It highlights the key role that line managers play in employee disclosure and access to support but demonstrates that line managers vary in their delivery of support to employees. Lastly, it explores stakeholder perceptions of the roles of the employer relative to the employee with chronic pain. It confirms the need for additional resources to plug organisational gaps and give workers tools to self-manage their pain at work. ORIGINALITY: This study indicates the need for resources / supports to upskill line managers so they can intervene to proactively support employees with chronic pain to reduce sickness absence and presenteeism (working when unwell). The research demonstrates organisational stakeholders' interest in a multi-faceted approach to help employees self-manage chronic pain in all types at work, such as that provided by the Pain-at-Work Toolkit. In addition, it clearly identifies the potential for complementary resources to educate and facilitate line managers to better support their staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.