Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391266›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Navigating ethical waters: The impact of ethical judgment, norms, and CSR skepticism on CSR engagement and purchasing intention in a breast cancer campaign.

Yang Cheng, Yangzhi Nicole Jiang, Qizhao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yang ChengDepartment of Communication, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0321-7956
Yangzhi Nicole JiangSchool of Communication, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, United States of America.
Qizhao ZhangDepartment of Organizational Sciences and Communication, The George Washington U, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns play a crucial role in shaping consumer perceptions and behavior. This study examines Delta Air Lines' CSR campaign centered on breast cancer awareness, focusing on how ethical judgment and subjective norms are associated with CSR skepticism and how such skepticism, in turn, relates to CSR engagement and ethical purchasing intention. Drawing on the theory of reasoned action (TRA), a quantitative survey was conducted with 787 Delta Air Lines customers, all of whom provided informed consent prior to participation. The data, analyzed between August 1-7, 2024 using structural equation modeling, show that ethical judgment and subjective norms are associated with lower levels of CSR skepticism. In turn, CSR skepticism is negatively related to both CSR engagement and ethical purchasing intention, while higher levels of CSR engagement are associated with greater ethical purchasing intention. These findings provide insight into the role of ethical and social factors in shaping consumer responses to CSR initiatives and highlight the importance of fostering engagement to enhance the effectiveness of CSR campaigns and promote favorable consumer outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsConsumer BehaviorJudgmentSocial ResponsibilityAdultFemaleHumansIntentionMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTheory of Planned Behavior

Identifiers

PMID42391266
PMCPMC13327129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.