ArticlePloS one2026
Cirrhosis outcomes on rurality and weekend admissions revisited: A contemporary analysis of the national inpatient sample.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe impact of hospital rurality and weekend admission on outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis remains unclear. Studies suggest mixed effects of weekend admission on mortality and increased mortality in rural hospital admissions for decompensated cirrhosis. This study evaluated the influence of hospital rurality, weekend admission, and their interaction on outcomes in decompensated cirrhosis from 2016 to 2020.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) assessed in-hospital mortality (primary outcome), likelihood of specific procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, paracentesis, TIPS, hemodialysis), and time to first procedure. Regression models adjusted for demographics, liver disease etiology, clinical severity (APR-DRG mortality risk), and other factors.
resultsAmong 11,845,223 hospitalizations, rural hospitalizations were linked to lower in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.80-0.86) and higher transfer rates for severe cases (7.2% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). Weekend admissions showed a statistically significant but only modest reduction in mortality odds (OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.975-0.998). No significant interaction existed between rurality and weekend admission regarding mortality. Rural hospitals showed lower odds of performing procedures (95% CIs < 1), though time to procedure was comparable, except for earlier hemodialysis (-1.35 days; 95% CI: -2.59 to -0.11). Weekend admissions did not significantly impact procedure rates, except for paracentesis (OR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-0.99).
conclusionsUsing a national cohort of hospitalized patients with decompensated cirrhosis, we showed that rural hospitals exhibited lower in-hospital mortality, fewer procedures, and higher transfer rates, and that weekend admissions showed only a minimal, clinically insignificant reduction in mortality, irrespective of hospital rurality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.