ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Mobility and non-household environments: Understanding dengue transmission patterns in urban contexts.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Households (HH) have been traditionally described as the main environments where people are at risk of dengue and other arbovirus infections. Mounting entomological evidence suggests a larger role for environments other than HH. Recently, an agent-based model (ABM) estimated that over half of infections occur in non-household (NH) environments such as workplaces, markets, and recreational sites. Despite the inferred importance of NH sites, we do not yet know how their urban spatial configurations, and human and vector mobility between them, affects their role in dengue transmission. To address this gap, we expanded an ABM calibrated with field data from Kenya to examine movement of people and vectors under different spatial configurations of buildings. We assessed the number of people traveling between HH and NH and the distances traveled, in three urban configurations: NH distributed randomly (scattered), concentrated in a single center, or clustered in multiple centers. Across simulations, the number of people moving was the most influential variable, with higher movement between HH and NH increasing case numbers. The number of cases was also higher when NH were scattered compared to centered or clustered. Intriguingly, the distance people traveled from HH to NH had little effect on dengue burden but influenced the spatial clustering of infections. These findings underscore the role of NH as major spreaders of infections between HH and NH environments, and the importance of human movement in driving dengue dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.