ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Implementing the World Health Organization - Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Article 5.3: A qualitative study in 17 Indian states.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India experiences a high degree of tobacco industry interference. The World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, in its Article 5.3, requires members to protect their policies from tobacco industry influence. Despite the global guidance, the implementation of the Article 5.3 of the convention remains far from desired. We study implementation processes concerning the Article 5.3 policies in 17 of the 19 Indian states that had adopted such policies by 2023. We first conducted an online survey to understand the nature and enforcement of Article 5.3 policies. We then conducted focus group discussions engaging representatives from governments and civil society. The inquiry focused on understanding the prevailing policies, perceived challenges, and good practices in policy implementation as well as the perceived policy impacts. We used reflexive thematic analysis of the qualitative data. There were 17 respondents for the survey, and a total of 258 participants in 17 focus group discussions across study states. Major perceived challenges in the implementation of Article 5.3 policies included limited dissemination/awareness about these policies, suboptimal functioning of the committees overseeing implementation, low priority accorded to these policies, and interference by the tobacco industry. Several government departments were perceived vulnerable to industry interference, with the departments of education, health, and municipal administration perceived as the most vulnerable. A few states adopted practices that facilitated Article 5.3 policy implementation, including display of policy signage/declarations, issue of policy orders/notifications by non-health departments, and setting up a complaints mechanism and norms to avoid sponsorships by private entities. These policies were perceived to have reduced visible interference from the industry and enabled some of the government agencies to refuse funding/partnerships with the tobacco industry. The sub-national Article 5.3 policies in India have a promise to reduce tobacco industry interference. However, implementation of these policies ought to be strengthened.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.