ArticlePloS one2026
Data-driven prediction and thermodynamic performance assessment of industrial cooling towers using advanced machine learning algorithms.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cooling towers are an important part of the thermal system in industries, where they are used to remove unwanted heat and help maintain the proper performance of the machines. Four machine learning algorithms, namely random forest, support vector machine (SVM), decision tree, and AdaBoost are proposed in this paper for the performance forecasting of cooling towers. for the performance forecasting of cooling towers. These models were built in Python with the help of the following operational parameters: inlet water temperature (32-41°C), ambient air temperature (14-32°C), and relative humidity (35-92%). All the essential performance measures like outlet water temperature, water losses, the effectiveness, and the second law efficiency were predicted and assessed by statistical indicators such as coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The SVM algorithm had the best predictive accuracy and lowest prediction errors of all the tested models with a value of R2 of 0.985 and RMSE of 1.25 kg/s. Parametric analysis had indicated that the increase in relative humidity between 35% and 92% decreased the evaporation losses by about 55-70% and makeup water demand by about 58-68%. Thermodynamic analysis further revealed that the second-law efficiency improved by approximately 65-75% as the ambient temperature increased. The results indicate that predictive modeling with machine learning offers a useful method in the optimization of cooling tower operation and minimizing water use in industrial systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.