Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42391205›Full record

ArticleSexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation2026

Differences in Early Development between Parental Species and Asexual Hybrids forms of European Spined Loaches (Genus

Alena Zikmundová, Grzegorz Skórzewski, Roman Franěk, Tomáš Tichopád, Oldřich Bartoš, Daniel Kulik, Martin Pšenička, Jan Kotusz, Karel Janko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual development : genetics, molecular biology, evolution, endocrinology, embryology, and pathology of sex determination and differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alena ZikmundováFaculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia.
Grzegorz SkórzewskiFaculty of Biological Science, Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland, grzegorz.skorzewski@uwr.edu.pl.
Roman FraněkFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czechia.
Tomáš TichopádAcademy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Liběchov, Czechia.
Oldřich BartošAcademy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Liběchov, Czechia.
Daniel KulikAcademy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Liběchov, Czechia.
Martin PšeničkaFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czechia, psenicka@frov.jcu.cz.
Jan KotuszFaculty of Biological Science, Museum of Natural History, University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland.
Karel JankoFaculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czechia, janko@iapg.cas.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHybridization and polyploidy are increasingly recognized as major drivers of evolutionary innovation. By merging and multiplying genomes, they induce profound regulatory and structural perturbations that can alter phenotypes, yet the mechanisms by which they influence development remain debated. In particular, while theory predicts that polyploidy increases cause the increase in cell size, resulting in slower development, empirical findings are mixed. Moreover, the independent effects of polyploidization and hybrid genome admixture on early ontogeny are rarely disentangled. Here, we used the Cobitis taenia-C. elongatoides hybrid complex, a natural system comprising two sexual diploids and both diploid and triploid asexual hybrids to investigate how hybridization and polyploidy affect early development.

methodsWe examined two key developmental processes: (1) the timing of embryonic progression from the first cleavage to somitogenesis and (2) migration of primordial germ cells (PGCs), which are crucial for reproductive competence. By comparing both hybrid types to each of their sexual progenitors, we were able to isolate the effects of genome merging versus genome multiplication.

resultsWe found distinct developmental delays linked to effects of the parental genome, hybridization, and ploidy. Initial cleavage dynamics was mostly attributable to differences between the two parental species, while later delays were more pronounced in hybrids, regardless of ploidy, highlighting hybridization-driven developmental shifts. Only at subsequent stages did ploidy-specific effects emerge, prolonging development in triploids against all diploid forms. In contrast, PGC number and migration were primarily influenced by ploidy, with triploids showing higher PGC counts than diploids.

conclusionOur findings reveal that hybridization and polyploidy exert both independent and interactive effects on early ontogeny. The Cobitis complex thus offers a powerful model for exploring developmental consequences of genome restructuring.

Indexed as

CypriniformesHybridization, GeneticReproduction, AsexualAnimalsPolyploidyCobitisHybridizationPolyploidizationPrimordial germ cells

Identifiers

PMID42391205
PMCPMC13498317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.