ArticleJournal of radiation research2026
Factors associated with acute radiation-induced nocturia in localized prostate cancer treated with proton beam therapy.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined factors associated with acute radiation-induced nocturia (ARIN) in patients with localized prostate cancer (LPC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT). We included 140 patients who underwent PBT for LPC. Of these, 80 patients with implanted hydrogel spacers were treated with moderately hypo-fractionated proton therapy (MHPT) (60-66 GyRBE in 20-22 fractions) and 60 patients without hydrogel spacers were treated with normo-fractionated proton therapy (NFPT) (74-78 GyRBE in 37-39 fractions). In-room computed tomography was performed for each fraction to monitor target position. Prostate-rectum boundary matching was adopted to effectively reduce rectal dose, and position translation and pitch angle corrections were performed depending on rectal filling changes. ARIN was evaluated based on the nocturnal voiding frequencies. We first performed multivariate logistic regression (MLR) analysis to identify significant factors for ARIN. Subsequently, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed as a sensitivity analysis to address potential confounding and to assess the robustness of the findings. The analyses showed that 45/140 patients experienced ARIN during/immediately after PBT. MLR analysis showed that 'treatment regimen' (MHPT with spacer vs NFPT without spacer) was statistically significantly associated with ARIN (OR: 0.25, 95% CI: 0.09-0.67, P < 0.05). This association remained significant after PSM. In conclusion, while 'treatment regimen' was statistically associated with ARIN, this finding should be interpreted cautiously as reflecting a composite treatment strategy within the limitations of a retrospective analysis, rather than a causal relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.