ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2026
Global Roll-Out and Continued Multi-Site Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Histology Instrument for Qualitative Assessment of Histopathology in Ulcerative Colitis.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHistological assessment of mucosal biopsies in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) can determine the activity and extent of disease and assess response to treatment. However, its widespread adoption is limited by the time required for the advanced GI specialty training to handle and review histopathology digital images, inter- and intra-observer variability, and cost associated with the interpretation of data. Artificial intelligence, and specifically machine learning‒driven medical image processing, have emerged to help standardise and automate histopathologic assessments.
methodsIn this global study conducted with participation of 38 sites in 19 countries (global roll-out phase), we collected histopathologic slides prepared from biopsy samples from patients with UC to train an AI model to recognise various cell types and assign a disease activity score based on the Nancy histological index (NHI). Results were compared with findings from a previous iteration of the machine learning model (pilot roll-out phase).
resultsIn total, 850 tiles were analysed and used for training, validation, and testing. Model quality, assessed using the Nancy metric, improved from 61.50% in the pilot roll-out phase to 74.82% in the current global roll-out phase. Cell detection quality (F1-score metric) also increased from 27.50% (pilot roll-out) to 58.80% (global roll-out).
conclusionsIn this global roll-out, the quality of the AI model was significantly improved for both NHI scores and cell detection. Further development and implementation of the model at the participating international sites continues and may lead to a valuable and scalable tool for the analysis of disease activity in UC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.