ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Efficient Coupled-Cluster Python Frameworks for Next-Generation GPUs: A Comparative Study of CuPy and PyTorch on the Hopper and Grace Hopper Architecture.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we introduce new batching algorithms to effectively handle large contractions encountered in coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) implementations in Python on the video random access memory (VRAM) of graphical processing units (GPUs), thereby improving performance. Specifically, we benchmark the performance of the CuPy and PyTorch libraries on a single NVIDIA Hopper (H100) and the Grace Hopper (GH200) architectures. We begin by optimizing the particle-particle ladder bottleneck contraction in CCSD using an asymmetric and dynamic splitting recipe, and then move toward a generic tensor contraction protocol that enables tensor contractions to be performed almost exclusively on GPUs. We benchmark our new, fully generic GPU-accelerated coupled-cluster implementations for various molecular systems and basis-set sizes, using both the CuPy and PyTorch libraries. While PyTorch outperforms CuPy on H100 by approximately 20%, both perform similarly on the GH200 architecture. Compared to our initial GPU implementation [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2024, 20, 3, 1130-1142], we achieve a 10-fold speedup. In molecular CCSD calculations, we report additional speedups between 3 and 16 for a single CCSD iteration using Cholesky-decomposed electron repulsion integrals compared to our original GPU-CPU hybrid implementation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.