ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Fertility knowledge and family planning perspectives among female physicians: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFemale physicians spend a substantial proportion of their fertile years in academic and clinical training. The present study assessed fertility-related knowledge, concerns, and barriers to family planning among female physicians in Germany and their potential impact on career development. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, cisgender female physicians from all disciplines and career stages practicing in Germany were recruited via online platforms, printed flyers, and women physicians' associations. An anonymous online survey was conducted between August 2024 and September 2025. It collected data on demographics, clinical, and academic career trajectories, fertility knowledge (using a modified FIT-KS and classified according to Bloom's cut-off values), as well as motherhood and career intentions. Associations were examined using Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients and chi-square tests. p-values were interpreted descriptively, with a significant threshold set at p < 0.05.
resultsOf the 250 participating physicians, 214 completed the survey. The median age was 36.5 years (IQR 32-44). Respondents included residents (43.8%), specialists (22.3%), and senior physicians (19.5%). Overall fertility knowledge was moderate with a mean correct response rate of 70.2%. A total of 9.2% participants aspired to the highest academic rank, while 10.7% aimed for the highest clinical leadership position. Most respondents (90.2%) considered leadership positions compatible with part-time work. More than half reported postponing family planning, primarily due to limited career opportunities, long and inflexible working hours, and inadequate childcare support. Overall, 59% were mothers, with a mean of 1.99 children, and the mean age at first childbirth was 31.8 years. A higher age at first childbirth was significantly associated with retrospective regret about delaying parenthood. Physicians with children were more likely to work part-time. Among childless respondents, the main reasons were lack of suitable time due to studies or work (60.2%) and prioritization of career (45.5%).
conclusionsFertility knowledge was moderate, suggesting that additional education may be needed to support informed family planning decisions. Greater acceptance and implementation of flexible working models, together with improved childcare infrastructure, may contribute to reducing barriers to balancing family and career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.