ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Pearls and pitfalls in the imaging of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) in the setting of trauma remains an underrecognized entity, and delays in diagnosis can significantly affect patient outcomes. Clinical findings are often unreliable because of associated distracting injuries and the delayed manifestation of abdominal signs. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality for detecting blunt bowel and mesenteric injury. CT findings can be categorized into signs of bowel injury, signs of mesenteric injury, and ancillary imaging features that should prompt heightened suspicion for bowel and mesenteric trauma. Bowel findings can be further categorized into hard signs, which generally suggest the need for surgical intervention, and soft signs, which require integration with clinical and laboratory data. Awareness of the pearls and pitfalls of imaging can improve diagnostic confidence, reduce missed findings, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390775What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.