ReviewCarbon balance and management2026
Artificial intelligence for carbon emissions management: advances, challenges, and future directions across monitoring, prediction, and reduction.
Review in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rising anthropogenic carbon emissions are a major driver of climate change and pose a critical challenge to global sustainable development. As a rapidly advancing technology, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown strong potential to enhance carbon emissions management. This review provides a critical and comprehensive synthesis of recent advances in AI-enabled approaches for carbon emissions monitoring, prediction, and reduction. For monitoring, it explores the integration of satellite remote sensing, sensor networks, and machine learning (ML) algorithms, which can improve multi-scale, high-resolution, and near-real-time monitoring capabilities. For prediction, it categorizes prediction models into three groups, namely deep learning (DL), ensemble learning, and statistical learning, to facilitate the selection of appropriate technical approaches based on varying data characteristics and prediction requirements. For reduction, it examines the practical effectiveness of AI in industrial process optimization, energy structure transformation, transportation scheduling and management, construction energy efficiency improvement, and carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS). We further reveal core challenges and potential solutions across the data layer, model layer, and application layer in AI deployment, including data availability and quality, model generalization and interpretability, and engineering and governance barriers that hinder the translation of AI methods into real-world applications. Furthermore, future research directions are discussed to promote the development of more reliable and scalable AI methods that can better support decision-making and practical governance in carbon emissions management. Overall, distinct from previous reviews that mainly focus on single tasks, specific model types, or sectoral applications, this review represents, to our knowledge, one of the first review-level attempts to develop a policy-relevant and interdisciplinary AI framework for carbon emissions management across the full process of monitoring, prediction, and reduction. By integrating unified evaluation metrics, evidence matrices, deployment-constraint analysis, and a technology readiness level (TRL)-based assessment, this framework links methodological performance, application readiness, and governance needs. It provides an integrated methodological foundation for fine-grained emissions sensing, predictive analysis, and emissions reduction decision support, while supporting quantifiable, verifiable, and actionable carbon balance and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.