Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390742›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

In Silico Identification and Comparative Synteny of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in Plants.

Song Wu, Evangelos C Tatsis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Song WuNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Evangelos C TatsisNational Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Plant Sciences, Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. evangelos.tatsis@hainan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) are often encoding specialized metabolic pathways in plants, yet effective methods for the comparison across multiple species are still evolving. In this protocol, we present a bioinformatics approach combining plantiSMASH and MCScan for the identification, annotation, and comparative analysis of BGCs in plant genomes. The methodology involves using plantiSMASH to predict and annotate potential BGCs, followed by the use of MCScan to perform syntenic analysis, enabling the exploration of the conservation and evolutionary dynamics of BGCs across different plant species. Here, we provide a step-by-step guide for installing and configuring the necessary software, preparing genomic data, and executing the analysis. This methodology, integrated with transcriptomic and metabolomic data, can be used to verify the functional relevance of the identified BGCs in specific biosynthetic pathways. It is applicable to a broad range of plant species and serves as a framework for the discovery and characterization of BGCs. The described methodology can significantly enhance research in plant genomics and metabolic engineering by offering new insights into the organization and function of BGCs.

Indexed as

Biosynthetic PathwaysComputational BiologyMultigene FamilyPlantsSyntenyComputer SimulationGenome, PlantGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationSoftwareBiosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs)Comparative genomicsMCScanPlant genomesplantiSMASHSpecialized metabolismSyntenic analysis

Identifiers

PMID42390742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.