Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390720›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Distinctive Endoscopic Ultrasound Features of Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Chen Ke, Dang Yini, Zheng Qiang, He Ming, Liu Jianqiang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chen KeDepartment of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Dang YiniDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zheng QiangDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
He Ming *Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liu Jianqiang *Department of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. ljianqiang@fudan.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy with poorer prognosis than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to identify distinctive endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features for pre-operative differentiation between PASC and PDAC.

methodsForty-six PASC patients and 683 PDAC patients were retrospectively enrolled. Propensity score matching (1:2) balanced age, sex, and tumor size. EUS characteristics were compared, and independent predictors were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

resultsPASC tumors were significantly larger than PDAC tumors at baseline (p < 0.001). After matching, multivariate analysis identified five independent predictors of PASC: higher serum albumin (OR = 1.256), hyperechoic foci (OR = 7.733), non-infiltrative growth pattern (INF C: OR = 0.163), and absence of pancreatic duct dilation (positive: OR = 0.021; unknown: 0.008) (all p < 0.05). The model demonstrated good discrimination with an AUC of 0.931 (95% CI 0.888-0.974). PASC more frequently exhibited hyperechoic foci (69.6% vs. 34.8%) and expansive growth, while PDAC typically showed infiltrative growth and duct dilation.

conclusionPASC demonstrates distinctive EUS features including hyperechoic foci, expansive growth pattern, and less frequent ductal obstruction compared with PDAC, which may facilitate pre-operative differentiation from PDAC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, AdenosquamousCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalEndosonographyPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesDiagnostic imagingEndoscopic ultrasonographyNeoplasmsPancreaticPropensity score-matched

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.