ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Planned missingness in intensive longitudinal studies: Extensions and comparisons of multiform designs.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Technological advances in data collection have made intensive longitudinal studies (ILSs) increasingly feasible. However, conducting such studies often leads to increased participant burden due to the high frequency of measurements, resulting in nonresponse and a consequent reduction in data quantity and quality. Previous studies have shown that planned missingness designs can help optimize data collection. In this paper, we extend two multiform designs commonly used in planned missingness research and propose a flexible alternative involving completely random sampling. These designs are better tailored to ILSs by varying item subset combinations across measurement occasions for each participant. Specifically, we examined (1) the anchor test design, where a core subset is administered to all participants across all occasions; (2) the matrix sampling design, where subset combinations rotate systematically; and (3) the random sampling design, where subset combinations are randomly assigned at each occasion. We conducted two simulation studies to evaluate the performance of these designs within the dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) framework across varying key model parameters, sample sizes, numbers of time points, and planned missingness proportions. An empirical example is also provided to demonstrate the potential of multiform designs in ILSs. Results indicate that these multiform designs can yield unbiased parameter point estimates with acceptable credible interval coverage rates, while maintaining sufficient statistical power. Therefore, the extended and proposed multiform designs enable researchers to reduce both the costs and participant burden while still obtaining adequate data to capture characteristics in the dynamic process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.