Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390655›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2026

The Molecular Machinery of Synaptic Plasticity and Its Potential Role in the Aetiology of Schizophrenia.

Brian J Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Brian J MorrisSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK. Brian.Morris@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4439-0795

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered glutamatergic and dopaminergic transmission in regions including cortex and hippocampus is thought to contribute to schizophrenia symptoms. The prominent role of glutamate (particularly via NMDA receptors) and dopamine (particularly via D2 receptors) in synaptic plasticity, and the impairment of plasticity-associated cognitive function in the condition, has suggested that schizophrenia may be viewed as a disorder of synaptic plasticity. This is encouraging, as regards developing improved treatments, as plasticity by its nature is dynamic and malleable. However, there are many distinguishable forms of synaptic plasticity, and it is not immediately obvious whether all forms are affected, and throughout the brain, or whether specific forms of plasticity are compromised, and only in certain brain regions. Here, I describe the molecules mediating various forms of plasticity, and collate the electrophysiological, imaging, pathological, genetic and biochemical evidence to address their possible dysfunction in schizophrenia. The overall picture is consistent with suboptimal function of all forms of plasticity, in circuitry centred on prefrontal cortex and thalamus. Many of the neurobiological changes characteristic of schizophrenia (reduced metabolic activity, GABAergic interneuron gene expression and dendritic spine density, in circuitry centred on prefrontal cortex) can be viewed as consequences of compromised plasticity rather than fundamental aetiological factors. Of hundreds of genes potentially contributing to genetic risk, more than 60 are directly implicated in plasticity processes, comprising receptors, voltage-sensitive Ca

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticitySchizophreniaAnimalsHumansGenetic associationParvalbuminPleiotrophinPsychosisSchizophreniaSynapses

Identifiers

PMID42390655
PMCPMC13328218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.