SynthesisNeurosurgical review2026
Seizure risk prediction models after intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current models for predicting seizure risk after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) frequently demonstrate suboptimal accuracy. Despite the increasing number of these predictive tools, their utility in clinical practice and research remains poorly defined. A search of eight databases from their inception through September 18, 2025, was undertaken to identify studies of predictive models related to post-ICH seizures. Risk of bias and applicability were evaluated using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). From 2,578 retrieved studies, eight prediction models from nine studies were included. The observed incidence of post-hemorrhagic stroke seizures (PHSS) ranged from 3.07% to 12.75%. All studies were determined to have a high risk of bias, primarily due to poor reporting of the analysis domain. Meta-analysis indicated that a hematoma volume ≥ 10 mL, early seizures, cortical involvement, and surgical intervention served as independent predictors of PHSS. The pooled area under the curve for the eight models was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76-0.86), showing that the models have moderate to good discriminative capacity. Future research must prioritize rigorous model validation, adhering to PROBAST standards to ensure methodological quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.