ArticlePsychological research2026
When emotions hurt: negative interpretations of bodily signals and interoceptive difficulties in fibromyalgia.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
People with fibromyalgia often demonstrate hypersensitivity to benign bodily signals and misattribute non-noxious physical signals as pain, suggesting alterations in body-brain communication and interoception. However, little is known about whether altered body-brain communication may extend to misattribution of emotion as pain. Here, using a cross-sectional design, we aimed to investigate how individuals with fibromyalgia perceive, identify, and interpret emotions and other bodily sensations, including pain, compared to healthy controls. Across two independent studies, individuals with fibromyalgia and age- and gender-matched pain-free controls completed the emBODY task, which assesses the topography of bodily sensations experienced for different states (emotional states, neutral state, pain- and physiology-related states, fatigue). Additionally, participants completed assessments of alexithymia, bodily sensation interpretation, and interoception. In both studies, linear discriminant analysis, performed to test whether different emotions and states are associated with statistically distinct bodily patterns, indicated comparable classification accuracy of body sensation maps in the fibromyalgia group and controls. However, compared with controls, the fibromyalgia group showed higher levels of alexithymia, higher awareness of bodily signals, and more negative interpretation of ambiguous bodily sensations in daily life, together with greater self-reported interoceptive difficulties. Our findings support an amplified perception of bodily signals coupled with interoceptive difficulties in people with fibromyalgia. This raises the possibility that interventions that target perceptual retraining, and re-interpretation of bodily sensations might decrease the impact of pain and promote engagement in everyday activities for people with fibromyalgia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.