ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Management and outcomes in acute symptomatic hernias: a retrospective cohort study and review of cross-over to surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Watchful waiting or dynamic reassessment? Interpreting surgical crossover in acute symptomatic hernias.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHernias are a frequent cause of acute surgical admission, yet optimal management remains uncertain. Watchful waiting (WW) and waiting-list delays may increase symptom recurrence and surgical crossover, creating uncertainty about when timely elective repair is indicated. This study evaluates acute hernia presentations and how different management pathways may influence outcomes.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on 105 patients presenting with symptomatic hernias to the University Hospitals of Leicester from period of September 2024 to January 2025 with patient follow-up in September 2025. Outcomes analysed included length of hospital stay, complications, surgical crossover rates, and re-presentations.
resultsA total of 105 patients met the inclusion criteria. 51(49%) patients were conservatively managed with WW, and 43(41%) listed for elective repair, and 11(10%) underwent emergency surgery at presentation. WW patients had higher re-presentation rates (35.3 vs. 14%, p = 0.0172) and surgical crossover rates (33.3 vs. 2.3%, p < 0.001) relative to those awaiting elective surgery. In the WW cohort, crossover occurred in 50% of inguinal hernias (9.1% to emergency; 40.9% to elective) and approximately 20.7% of ventral hernias (10.3% to emergency; 10.3% to elective). Emergency hernia repair was associated with increased length of stay compared to elective repair for both ventral (median 4 vs. 0.5 days, p = 0.0079) and inguinal hernias (median 1.5 vs. 0 days, p < 0.001).
conclusionObserved surgical crossover and re-presentation among patients managed with watchful waiting may indicate the importance of identifying patients who are less suitable for prolonged non-operative management. Structured follow-up and reassessment may improve watchful waiting pathways and support shared decision-making regarding the appropriateness of surgical repair. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.