ReviewMycorrhiza2026
From manual scoring to machine learning: recent developments in image-based arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi root quantification.
Review in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selecting an appropriate method to quantify arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization in plants can be challenging, particularly for non-experts, due to the wide diversity of available techniques, some of which date back to the 1980s. Despite rapid methodological advances, comprehensive reviews focusing specifically on recent image analysis approaches for AMF root quantification are still scarce in the scientific literature. Given the growing potential of image-based methods to improve the accuracy, reproducibility, and high throughput of AMF root colonization assessment, this review synthesizes conceptual structure and thematic map of studies focusing on AMF colonization from 2001 to 2026. In addition, we examine widely used traditional approaches, such as the gridline intersect method, and emerging tools, including Visual Basic for Application-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VBA-AMF), MycoPatt, WinRHIZO, ImageJ-based workflows, Zeiss Intellesis, and deep learning approaches such as Automatic Mycorrhizal Finder (AMFinder), "Tool for Analysing root images to calculate the Infection rate of arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi" (TAIM) and Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN). By critically comparing their principles, capabilities, and limitations, this review aims to guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate image analysis methods for AMF quantification according to their experimental objectives and technical constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.