Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390600›Full record

ReviewMycorrhiza2026

From manual scoring to machine learning: recent developments in image-based arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi root quantification.

Annabelle Bouvette, Sulaimon Basiru, Mohamed Hijri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycorrhiza, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annabelle BouvetteInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale (IRBV), Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, H1X 2B2, Canada.
Sulaimon BasiruAfrican Genome Center, College of Agriculture & Environmental Sciences (CAES), University Mohammed VI Polytechnic (UM6P), Ben Guerir, 43150, Morocco.
Mohamed HijriInstitut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale (IRBV), Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, H1X 2B2, Canada. Mohamed.Hijri@umontreal.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6112-8372

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ALLRP-577245-2022; RGPIN-2024-04954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting an appropriate method to quantify arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) colonization in plants can be challenging, particularly for non-experts, due to the wide diversity of available techniques, some of which date back to the 1980s. Despite rapid methodological advances, comprehensive reviews focusing specifically on recent image analysis approaches for AMF root quantification are still scarce in the scientific literature. Given the growing potential of image-based methods to improve the accuracy, reproducibility, and high throughput of AMF root colonization assessment, this review synthesizes conceptual structure and thematic map of studies focusing on AMF colonization from 2001 to 2026. In addition, we examine widely used traditional approaches, such as the gridline intersect method, and emerging tools, including Visual Basic for Application-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (VBA-AMF), MycoPatt, WinRHIZO, ImageJ-based workflows, Zeiss Intellesis, and deep learning approaches such as Automatic Mycorrhizal Finder (AMFinder), "Tool for Analysing root images to calculate the Infection rate of arbuscular Mycorrhizal fungi" (TAIM) and Mask Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (Mask R-CNN). By critically comparing their principles, capabilities, and limitations, this review aims to guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate image analysis methods for AMF quantification according to their experimental objectives and technical constraints.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMycorrhizaePlant RootsArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiDigital microscopyImage analysisMachine learningQuantification methodsRoot colonization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.