ReviewIntensive care medicine2026
Prehospital airway and ventilatory management: a collaborative and narrative review.
Review in Intensive care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrehospital airway and ventilatory management is a frequent, high-stakes and technically demanding component of emergency care. Environmental constraints, limited resources, and variable provider experience make it particularly challenging, and prehospital care systems differ substantially across countries, from paramedic-based to physician-led models, contributing to heterogeneity in clinical practices and patient outcomes. In this narrative review, we discuss evidence-based best practice, including indications, timing, physiological optimization, procedural conduct, and post-intubation management of prehospital tracheal intubation or non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen.
methodsTracheal intubation remains the definitive airway management strategy when performed for appropriate indications by adequately trained providers. Indications span major trauma, traumatic brain injury, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and comatose patients, though its role in comatose poisoned patients is increasingly questioned. Physiology optimization before intubation is a critical and frequently underappreciated determinant of outcome, encompassing preoxygenation with non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, bag-valve-mask ventilation between induction and laryngoscopy, and careful sedative selection to limit peri-intubation hemodynamic compromise.
resultsWhen intubation fails, a structured escalation strategy including videolaryngoscopy, supraglottic airway devices, and emergency front-of-neck access must be rehearsed and immediately available. In out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, supraglottic airways represent a valid primary alternative with equivalent neurological survival and faster placement. Non-invasive ventilation (primarily CPAP and BiPAP) has a well-established role in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema and COPD exacerbations, reducing intubation rates and mortality. High-flow nasal oxygen is an emerging modality with strong in-hospital evidence, but prehospital data remain extremely limited and logistical constraints restrict its routine use. Non-invasive support must never delay intubation when clinical deterioration demands it.
conclusionSpecific contexts require tailored adaptations: altitude physiology in helicopter transport, obesity-specific positioning, cervical spine precautions in neurological injury, comfort-focused strategies in palliative patients, and proactive stabilization before prolonged transport. Evidence gaps remain, particularly regarding prehospital high-flow nasal oxygen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390593What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.