Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390547›Full record

ReviewEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026

Identifying needs and challenges in transitional mental health care: A scoping review on the perspectives of health and social care professionals.

Heléni De Backer, Nicolaas Martens, Jindra Bakker, Kris Van den Broeck, Thérèse van Amelsvoort, Inge Glazemakers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heléni De BackerResearch Centre Care in Connection, Karel de Grote University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Antwerp, 2018, Belgium. heleni.debacker@kdg.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7612-1075
Nicolaas MartensResearch Centre Care in Connection, Karel de Grote University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Antwerp, 2018, Belgium.
Jindra BakkerDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Research Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Kris Van den BroeckFAMPOP, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.
Thérèse van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Research Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Inge GlazemakersCAPRI, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, 2610, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) to Adult Mental Health Services (AMHS) is often associated with disrupted continuity of care, where young people may experience a loss of support during transfer. This scoping review identifies the needs and challenges experienced by health and social care professionals navigating this boundary, a perspective often overlooked in transition research. A systematic search of major databases identified literature published between 2014 and 2025. Following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, 25 peer-reviewed publications were included after screening 4,040 records. Data were charted using a standardised extraction form and synthesised thematically within a socio-ecological framework across individual, interpersonal, service, and societal levels. Findings indicate multilevel barriers affecting transitions from CAMHS to AMHS. At the individual level, professionals often lack developmentally informed knowledge and disorder-specific expertise, alongside training to support autonomy as an ongoing process. Interpersonally, differences in care cultures -family-oriented in CAMHS versus more individualised in AMHS- complicate continuity, compounded by the absence of bridging roles and insufficient family involvement. At the service level, fragmentation is reinforced by inconsistent implementation of protocols, unclear responsibilities, and restrictive eligibility criteria, often resulting in a loss of continuity of care. At the societal level, rigid age boundaries and structural underfunding of coordination further perpetuate discontinuity. Despite well-documented challenges, progress in implementing sustainable solutions remains limited. Advancing transition care requires a shift towards action-oriented, multilevel implementation research. Integrated models, such as multidisciplinary youth mental health teams, are essential to ensure developmentally appropriate continuity of care.

Indexed as

AMHSCAMHSContinuity of careProfessional perspectivesTransitional psychiatry

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.