ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Visual rating scales of atrophy differentiate sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorder: DIPPA study.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sporadic behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is often misdiagnosed as late-onset primary psychiatric disorder (PPD) due to overlapping symptoms and lack of disease-specific biomarkers. This multicenter pilot study aimed to identify brain atrophy patterns using visual rating scales (VRS) that distinguish between groups, and to compare VRS performance with standard clinical assessment. Magnetic resonance images from bvFTD and PPD patients across five centers were retrospectively reviewed. One rater, blinded for the clinical diagnosis, applied eight VRS. Group differences were assessed, the most predictive scales were identified and combined into a composite score, and the predictivity compared. 297 bvFTD and 92 PPD patients were analysed. All VRS yielded higher atrophy in bvFTD than in PPD patients. The Orbitofrontal, the Anterior-Temporal, and the Fronto-Insula scales were the strongest discriminators, and their composite score outperformed any individual scale. VRS may provide useful diagnostic support for distinguishing bvFTD from PPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42390534What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.