ArticleAnnals of emergency medicine2026
Variation in Emergency Department Experience With Pediatric Critical Illness.
Article in Annals of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectiveWe sought to describe variation in emergency department (ED) volume of pediatric critical illness encounters, and to assess the geographic proximity of encounters at low-volume EDs relative to high-volume EDs.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department and Inpatient Databases for 5 states from 2018 to 2022. Critical illness was defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or endotracheal intubation in the ED or on hospital day 0 or 1 or ED critical care time billing. We calculated the ED-level incidence of critical illness and dichotomized EDs into low- or high-volume at the 75th percentile of volume for each state and year. We determined how many encounters at low-volume EDs occurred within a 15-minute drive of a high-volume ED.
resultsOf 14,313,896 pediatric ED encounters across 569 EDs, 40,483 (0.3%) were critical. The median ED managed 1,932 pediatric visits each year (interquartile range [IQR] 680 to 5,068) and 5 (IQR 1 to 14) with critical illness. We identified 181 (31.8%) EDs with a calendar year with no pediatric critical illness. We found 1,557 (16.8%) critically ill children were managed in low-volume EDs within a 15-minute drive of a high-volume ED.
conclusionMost EDs infrequently care for critically ill children, and a minority of these encounters could be realistically diverted to high-volume EDs. Direct transport to high-volume centers is unlikely to be a universal strategy for ensuring access to high-quality emergency care for critically ill children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.