ArticleJMIR medical informatics2026
IdeaDistiller-AI Support for Idea Synthesis in Concept Mapping: Algorithm Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Concept mapping (CM) is a widely used mixed method research approach for structuring and visualizing complex ideas across various fields, such as the health sciences. A critical bottleneck in the CM process is the idea synthesis phase, which remains labor-intensive, subjective, and consequently challenging to scale for large datasets. Objective: In this study, we propose IdeaDistiller, a semiautomated solution based on semantic clustering to optimize the idea synthesis step while maintaining methodological rigor through a human-in-the-loop approach. Methods: Using 9 health care-related datasets in English and Swedish, we systematically evaluated different embedding models, dimensionality reduction techniques, and clustering algorithms to identify robust and reproducible parameter settings for the proposed approach. IdeaDistiller clusters participant-generated ideas based on semantic similarity to identify similar ideas with different wording, suggests representative and unique ideas per cluster, and provides coherence scores and sorted outputs to aid manual validation. Results: Our findings suggest that IdeaDistiller may substantially reduce the manual effort involved in idea synthesis while preserving quality and transparency. However, human expertise remains indispensable for validating and refining cluster outputs. Conclusions: Integrating semiautomated methods into the CM workflow offers significant potential for improving the efficiency, scalability, and rigor of the CM process. Building on our work will enable the exploration of larger multilingual datasets and integration into future CM studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.