ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Training in the Categorization of Aerial and Terrestrial Scenes Differentially Impacts Scene-Selective and Nonscene-Selective Regions in Occipitotemporal Cortex.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training in the Categorization of Aerial and Terrestrial Scenes Differentially Impacts Scene-Selective and Nonscene-Selective Regions in Occipitotemporal Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Visual expertise for aerial- and ground-views of houses: No evidence for mental rotation, but experts were more diligent than novices.Perception · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are extremely adept at categorizing complex visual environments, an ability supported by a network of scene-selective cortical areas in occipitotemporal cortex (OTC), primarily parahippocampal- and occipital-place area (PPA, OPA, respectively). Despite increasing knowledge on the development of the scene-selective network, it is still not well-understood how experience impacts scene-related activity in the adult brain. A key question is how activity in scene-selective cortex changes as people gain experience in categorizing scenes. To address this question, we conducted an fMRI training study focused on the categorization of aerial and terrestrial scenes. Unlike terrestrial scenes, aerial scenes lack the same environmental regularities the brain has adapted to, and thus ideal for testing the impact of experience on scene-selective cortex. Over six training sessions, 39 participants (19 males and 20 females) were shown scenes of different categories from aerial and terrestrial viewpoints, with half the participants categorizing the scenes at a specific level (e.g., truss bridge/suspension bridge), whereas the other performed an unrelated task on the same images. Both groups were scanned before, during, and after training. We found that categorization training had a group-specific effect on responses in OPA and PPA, with greater neural sensitivity to viewpoint in the trained versus the untrained group. In contrast, nonscene-selective regions, such as object-selective LOC and early visual cortex showed no training effects. Improvements in behavioral performance, including learning transfer, were linked to changes in PPA activity level pre- versus-posttraining. We conclude that scene-selective cortex can support the learning of novel spatial geometries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.