Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390284›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2026

Can Data Mining Improve Methane Correction Factors for Urban, Nonsewered Sanitation?

Michael Vogel, Linda Strande

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael VogelEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Sandec: Department of Sanitation, Water and Solid Waste for Development Überlandstrasse 133, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.
Linda StrandeEawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Sandec: Department of Sanitation, Water and Solid Waste for Development Überlandstrasse 133, Dübendorf 8600, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-6268

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly half of the world's population relies on nonsewered sanitation, and in urban areas, intermittent onsite storage of wastewater prior to road-based transport to treatment is common. Anerobic biological activity during storage generates methane, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and posing challenges for climate mitigation. Current estimates of methane emissions rely on methane correction factors (MCFs) in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) guidelines that are based on theoretical assumptions and increasingly viewed as not valid. In this Perspective, we use 1349 data points from onsite storage of wastewater in 11 cities to show that obtaining accurate city-wide estimates is complicated by highly variable properties of in situ wastewater and storage conditions and hence biological production of methane. When it comes to greenhouse gas emissions from nonsewered sanitation, the sector has so far focused on storage, but as evidence suggests these estimates are too high, we propose that emphasis should in fact be placed on the entire service chain.

Indexed as

Data MiningMethaneSanitationCitiesClimate ChangeGreenhouse GasesWastewaterGreenhouse GasesMethaneWastewateranaerobic degradationemissionsfecal sludge managementgreenhouse gasintergovernmental panel on climate changestoragetreatmentwastewater

Identifiers

PMID42390284
PMCPMC13374094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.