ArticleJMIR medical education2026
Parenthood in US Medical Training Across Specialty Groups: Scoping Review.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Residency and fellowship are demanding phases characterized by intense schedules, limited autonomy, sleep deprivation, and hierarchical environments. Training years often coincide with peak reproductive age, presenting trainees with the dilemma of delaying parenthood or managing training and parenthood concurrently. Objective: This scoping review examines recent literature on factors influencing the experiences of male and female physician trainee parents across various specialties. Methods: Four databases were searched for studies published from January 2014 through January 2025 examining pregnancy, parenthood, or lactation outcomes among physician trainees and distinguishing between specialties. Eligible studies were screened, data extracted using predefined criteria, and findings thematically coded. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests assessed specialty-related differences for each theme. Results: The authors identified 15,861 records, removed 6440 duplicates, and excluded 8989 records. Further, 432 full-text papers were reviewed, with 105 papers included in the final analysis: surgical (n=59), medical subspecialty (n=30), primary care (n=11), and multiple specialties (n=5). Surgical and medical subspecialty studies more often identified interpersonal and policy challenges than primary care. Surgical studies highlighted issues such as pregnancy-related bias, lack of support, rigid schedules, and training-parenthood conflict. Primary care studies more often identified conflicts between parenthood and patient care responsibilities (primary care: 3/11, 27% vs surgical: 3/59, 5% and medical subspecialty studies 0/30, 0%, P=.01). Negative well-being impacts from training and parenthood were reported more often in primary care (3/11, 27%) and surgical studies (13/59, 22%) than in medical subspecialties (1/30, 3%, P=.03). Conclusions: Trainees face physician parenthood challenges across social ecological levels, with surgical and subspecialty trainees experiencing more systemic barriers and primary care trainees more patient care-related concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.