ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Sequential Donation: Evaluating Safety and Quality of Life of Living Donors.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the most persistent problems in transplantation in the U.S. is the demand for organs outweighs the supply. Sequential living donation may be one strategy to address this problem, however a reluctance to perform these surgeries exists secondary to the lack of research on the medical outcomes and quality of life of sequential post-donation. A medical record review of 34 sequential liver and kidney living donors and matched controls (by sex, age within 7 years, timing of surgery, and last organ donated) was performed. No significant difference between groups were observed on sociodemographic characteristics with the exception of age [p = 0.030] and marital status [p = 0.010] whereas matched controls were older and more likely to be married. One sequential donor started a chain for both organs which resulted in 7 transplant candidates receiving an organ. No statistically significant differences were observed in the number of complications [p = 0.081], emergency room visits [p = 0.573], 30-day [p = 0.573], 90-day readmissions [p < 0.999], or physical [p = 0.09] or mental health domains of quality of life [p = 0.78] at six or more months post-donation. Sequential donors returned to tobacco use more often than controls [p = 0.03] and matched controls were more likely to gain weight [p = 0.02] post donation. While further research is warranted, this study provides early evidence of the short-term safety of sequential donation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.