ReviewThe Journal of international medical research2026
Examining the state of telehealth for mental health and substance use care after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: An integrative review.
Review in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this integrative review was to synthesize literature and provide implications for clinical practice on telehealth use among patients with serious mental illness and substance use disorders following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.MethodsAn integrative review guided by Socio-Technical Systems Theory was applied. The PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Medline, Academic Search Complete, and Gale Health and Wellness databases were searched for publications from 1 January 2019 to 1 December 2024. Articles selected according to the established inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated using a rapid critical appraisal checklist developed by Fineout-Overholt and Melnyk.ResultsAmong the 172 articles reviewed, 16 peer-reviewed and 2 government publications were included. Four themes were identified: (a) treatment adherence; (b) satisfaction reported by patients and providers; (c) telehealth policy developments; and (d) access to services. Telehealth supported continuity of care, improved satisfaction, and improved access. Technological and financial barriers restricted equitable access. Policy changes enabled broader adoption; however, regulatory approaches varied across jurisdictions.ConclusionTelehealth remains an integral method for delivering mental health and substance use care following the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Greater focus is needed on long-term effectiveness and limitations of telehealth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.