ArticleJournal of proteome research2026
From Method-Defined Signals to Reference Measurement Procedures: Two Decades of Mass Spectrometry-Based ProGRP Quantification.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) is a clinically established biomarker in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Despite widespread clinical use, ProGRP measurement is challenged by low circulating concentrations and proteoform heterogeneity arising from alternative precursor processing. Current immunoassay-based methods generate operationally defined signals anchored to antibody-epitope interactions rather than chemically explicit molecular quantities, limiting result comparability across platforms. Mass spectrometry (MS) addresses these limitations through sequence-defined quantification, with the capacity to resolve sequence-distinct isoforms and, at the intact-protein level, individual proteoforms. In this Perspective, we examine two decades of MS-based ProGRP quantification as a case study for quantitative proteomics and measurement science. We trace the evolution from single-quadrupole workflows to isotope dilution strategies enabling increasingly selective and metrologically robust measurement, showing that performance gains were driven primarily by selectivity engineering and internal standardization rather than by mass analyzer advances. This trajectory progressively exposes a fundamental comparability problem: immunoassays and MS-based methods do not measure the same quantities. Resolving this discordance requires an explicit metrological framework encompassing measurand definition, traceability architecture, and reference measurement procedures (RMPs) based on protein-level isotope dilution MS. ProGRP serves as an instructive model for harmonizing quantitative protein biomarker measurements in clinical proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.