Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390033›Full record

ReviewJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2026

Dynamics of thoughts-novel candidate marker for differential-diagnosis of mental disorders?

Georg Northoff, Jingyu Hua, Xianliang Ge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Georg NorthoffUniversity of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, Canada.
Jingyu HuaUniversity of Ottawa Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8087-4290
Xianliang GeShaanxi Normal University, School of Psychology, Xian, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoughts are traditionally classified by their cognitive contents, such as task-related versus task-unrelated or internally versus externally oriented. However, content-based distinctions often lack diagnostic specificity in psychiatric disorders, where similar thought contents may manifest across conditions such as schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Here, we propose a complementary framework that characterizes thoughts by their dynamics, the pattern of changes in the thought contents over time-that is, their duration, speed, and temporal precision. Converging evidence in healthy individuals shows that distinct thought dimensions map onto specific neural timescales, ranging from fine-grained oscillatory phase dynamics to coarse-grained temporal windows. Extending this framework to psychopathology, schizophrenia is characterized by temporal imprecision of thought contents across shorter and longer timescales, yielding fragmented and poorly differentiated thoughts. In contrast, major depressive disorder is marked by abnormally prolonged timescales with abnormal slowness leading to rarely changing thought contents, e.g., ruminations. We propose that the timescales of thought contents and, more generally, thought dynamics may serve as a promising marker for the differential diagnosis of thought disturbances in mental disorders.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderMental DisordersSchizophreniaThinkingBrainDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansadolescent psychiatryclinical psychiatryneurosciencequantitative EEGschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID42390033
PMCPMC13325465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.