ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Quantifying the Influence of Lexical Surprisal on Acoustic Speech Encoding While Controlling for Within-Speaker Variability.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Quantifying the Influence of Lexical Surprisal on Acoustic Speech Encoding While Controlling for Within-Speaker Variability.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is substantial support for the idea that the listening brain makes predictions about upcoming speech and that these predictions are integrated with sensory input to influence perception. For example, the early auditory encoding of words appears to vary based on how those words semantically relate to their preceding context, suggesting that top-down information might feed back to affect acoustic speech processing. However, the way in which speakers enunciate words can vary based on how well those words fit with their preceding context. This presents a potential confound to the interpretation of top-down prediction in the listener. In this study, we address this possibility by assessing the influence of probability-based predictions (word surprisal) on electroencephalographic (EEG) indices of acoustic speech processing while controlling for variations in speaker dynamics. We analyzed EEG from 14 adults who undertook a perceptual pop-out task in which prior information enhanced the comprehensibility of degraded speech while acoustic information was held constant. Behavioral results confirmed the manipulation's effectiveness and were mirrored in the neural indices of word surprisal processing. Importantly, a positive relationship between word surprisal and EEG tracking of word acoustics emerged for degraded speech when prior information rendered it intelligible, but was absent when it was unintelligible, despite identical acoustic input across conditions. The difference in neural effects between conditions also correlated with the corresponding difference in behavioral pop-out. These findings support the claim that top-down word predictability influences the acoustic encoding of natural speech, independent of variations in speaker enunciation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.