Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42390025›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026

Quantifying the Influence of Lexical Surprisal on Acoustic Speech Encoding While Controlling for Within-Speaker Variability.

Shyanthony R Synigal, Michael P Broderick, Edmund C Lalor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shyanthony R SynigalDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Michael P BroderickSchool of Engineering, Trinity Centre for Bioengineering and Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Edmund C LalorDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.

Funding

Del Monte Institute for NeuroscienceIrish Research CouncilSimons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is substantial support for the idea that the listening brain makes predictions about upcoming speech and that these predictions are integrated with sensory input to influence perception. For example, the early auditory encoding of words appears to vary based on how those words semantically relate to their preceding context, suggesting that top-down information might feed back to affect acoustic speech processing. However, the way in which speakers enunciate words can vary based on how well those words fit with their preceding context. This presents a potential confound to the interpretation of top-down prediction in the listener. In this study, we address this possibility by assessing the influence of probability-based predictions (word surprisal) on electroencephalographic (EEG) indices of acoustic speech processing while controlling for variations in speaker dynamics. We analyzed EEG from 14 adults who undertook a perceptual pop-out task in which prior information enhanced the comprehensibility of degraded speech while acoustic information was held constant. Behavioral results confirmed the manipulation's effectiveness and were mirrored in the neural indices of word surprisal processing. Importantly, a positive relationship between word surprisal and EEG tracking of word acoustics emerged for degraded speech when prior information rendered it intelligible, but was absent when it was unintelligible, despite identical acoustic input across conditions. The difference in neural effects between conditions also correlated with the corresponding difference in behavioral pop-out. These findings support the claim that top-down word predictability influences the acoustic encoding of natural speech, independent of variations in speaker enunciation.

Indexed as

BrainSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEEGspeaker variabilityspeechsurprisalvocoding

Identifiers

PMID42390025
PMCPMC13325525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.