ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2026
Predicting Next-Day Passive Suicidal Ideation in At-Risk Youth.
Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPassive suicidal ideation (SI) is a well-established risk factor for suicidal behavior but has received less attention than active SI. Although recent work has leveraged intensive longitudinal data and machine learning (ML) to forecast short-term risk for active SI, passive SI remains understudied as a prediction target.
methodsSeventy-eight psychiatrically hospitalized youth (ages 13-17 years) completed baseline assessments and daily ratings of risk and protective factors for 28 days post-discharge. Multiple ML models were trained to predict the presence of next-day passive SI. Models with and without baseline variables were compared to assess the relative predictive value of time-varying versus baseline features.
resultsML models predicted next-day passive SI with high accuracy (AUC = 0.90). The strongest predictors were within-person 7-day moving averages of passive SI duration and frequency. Including baseline variables had negligible performance impact, even during initial days post-discharge.
conclusionsShort-term passive SI remains an underutilized but important target for suicide prevention. Forecasting next-day passive SI using ML is feasible and highly accurate. Within-person, time-varying features outperformed baseline factors, even in early days post-discharge. Additional research on SI facets, such as duration, is needed. Integrating passive SI into personalized intervention frameworks may enhance the precision of suicide prevention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.