ReviewGlobal spine journal2026
Spinal and Paraspinal Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors (MPNSTs): Survival, Local Recurrence, and the Relative Importance of Resection Extent and Margin Status.
Review in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignSystematic literature review.ObjectivesTo characterize clinical features, treatment patterns, and outcomes of spinal and paraspinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) and to evaluate the relative prognostic importance of extent of resection and surgical margin status.MethodsA search of published cases of spinal and paraspinal MPNSTs with individual-level treatment and outcome data was performed. Overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression. Competing-risk regression was used to assess local recurrence while accounting for death as a competing event. Model performance was compared using the Akaike information criterion.ResultsAmong 230 included patients, median OS was approximately 15 months, and median RFS was approximately 25 months, with a high early local recurrence rate. Metastatic disease at presentation was the strongest predictor of death (HR 3.02, 95% CI 1.57-5.84). Gross total resection was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.23-0.58) and LRFS (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72) and demonstrated superior model performance over surgical margin status. In a competing-risk analysis, intralesional resection was independently associated with increased local recurrence (sub-distribution HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.92), while neurofibromatosis type 1 also conferred elevated local recurrence risk.ConclusionsSpinal and paraspinal MPNSTs are characterized by poor survival and high early local recurrence. Extent of resection is the dominant surgical determinant of OS, whereas margin status primarily influences LRFS. These findings support the hypothesis that macroscopic total resection should be pursued even when negative margins cannot be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.