ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2026
Informal Human Milk Sharing: The Experiences and Practices of Informal Human Milk Sharing in Ireland.
Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Informal human milk sharing (IHMS) is a contemporary and evolving infant feeding practice. In the qualitative phase of a sequential explanatory mixed methods study, this research explored the experiences, practices, and perceived psychological and emotional impacts of IHMS from the perspectives of donors and recipients in Ireland. Fifteen participants were interviewed: ten donors, three recipients, and two who were donors and recipients. The study is reported according to the standards for reporting qualitative checklist (SRQR). Utilizing reflexive thematic analysis, five themes were identified: (1) Motivations for IHMS, (2) Formal milk banking: invisible, rigid and faceless, (3) The healthcare professional paradox, (4) Navigating risk and safety assurance by the "wee subculture," (5) Emotional and psychological impact of IHMS. Our findings reveal that participation in IHMS was propelled by personal imperatives and contextual motivations. Formal human milk bank's (HMB's) were described as rigid, invisible and "quite the effort." Participant narratives depict a culture where CMF was "pushed left, right and centre" in maternity settings as well as the intentional concealment of IHMS from healthcare professionals. Safety and risk mitigation were framed through "a huge trust network." IHMS has profound emotional and perceived psychological outcomes that were represented as a "light switch" release of maternal stress and anxiety for recipients while fostering a sense of pride and a "nice, warm, fuzzy feeling" for donors. There is an imminent need for policy reform and robust clinical frameworks to facilitate healthcare professional engagement, risk mitigation and enhancement of the visibility and accessibility of formal HMBs. Future research should evaluate HCP understanding of HMBs and IHMS in Ireland and similarly under-researched regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.