ArticleJournal of molecular recognition : JMR2026
3D-Printed Structures Versus Drilled Cavities: A Comparison of Microconfinement Methods for Rheological Characterisation of Multicellular Aggregates.
Article in Journal of molecular recognition : JMR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture systems are increasingly recognised as more physiologically relevant models than traditional two-dimensional cultures, as they better mimic the native tumour microenvironment and enable the study of complex cellular behaviour. However, applying atomic force microscopy (AFM) to these models is challenging due to the inherent instability of multicellular aggregates, which complicates reproducible mechanical property measurements. To address this, we developed and evaluated two distinct strategies for confining multicellular aggregates for AFM analysis. In the first approach, aggregates were encapsulated in porous 3D-printed truncated conical microstructures fabricated by two-photon polymerisation. These structures were designed to allow medium perfusion, which is hypothesised to improve nutrient and metabolite exchange by enhancing fluid accessibility within the confined environment. In the second, cylindrical cavities were microfabricated into the base of PolyHEMA-coated Petri dishes to provide a simple yet robust platform for aggregate retention. Both methods successfully confined aggregates without compromising cellular integrity, enabling reproducible and reliable measurements of stiffness and viscoelasticity. Human pancreatic cancer cells (PANC-1) were used both as single cells and as monotypic aggregates. Aggregates confined in either system were consistently softer than substrate-attached single cells, indicating reduced cytoskeletal tension and altered remodelling in 3D environments. Among the two approaches, cylindrical cavities provided more reliable aggregate retention, whereas the 3D-printed truncated conical structures may possibly facilitate improved medium access through their porous architecture. Together, these microconfinement strategies enable reproducible mechanical characterisation of multicellular aggregates and extend the applicability of AFM to tumour mechanobiology and the assessment of anticancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.