Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389812›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Advantages of Fluctuating Noise for Measuring Speech Intelligibility in Listeners With Hearing Loss.

Theresa Jansen, Kirsten C Wagener, Inga Holube, Laura Hartog, Christopher F Hauth, Saskia Ibelings, Jonte Kriebel, Dirk Oetting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Theresa JansenHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-6611-3861
Kirsten C WagenerHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2858-2789
Inga HolubeCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all.connects", Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-1936-8855
Laura HartogHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0004-0866-4212
Christopher F HauthCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all.connects", Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-5874
Saskia IbelingsCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all.connects", Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-4884
Jonte KriebelCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all.connects", Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-6123-2046
Dirk OettingHörzentrum Oldenburg gGmbH, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6032-7975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of speech intelligibility in noise show limited correspondence with difficulties people with hearing loss report from daily life. This mismatch suggests that standard measurement conditions do not sufficiently capture aspects that are relevant for speech perception, such as dip listening and spatial release from masking. In the present study we developed and evaluated a test condition that incorporates these aspects and compared it with a standard condition. Speech intelligibility was measured in 100 participants with normal hearing (NH, N=17) and hearing loss (HL, N=83) ranging from mild to severe. Measurements were conducted using the German matrix sentence test (OLSA) in the standard condition with frontal presentation of stationary noise co-located with the target speech, and the proposed condition with fluctuating, speech-like maskers spatially separated (±60°) from the target. Stimuli were presented via headphones using virtual acoustics. Tests were performed unaided and with individualized amplification. The proposed condition revealed reduced speech intelligibility also for listeners with HL that showed close-to-normal speech intelligibility in the standard condition. With individualized amplification, more listeners with HL showed reduced speech intelligibility compared to NH listeners than in the standard condition. Benefit of amplification varied widely across individuals with similar hearing thresholds, with some listeners showing little or no benefit. The advantages of the proposed condition were driven by masker fluctuations rather than by spatial separation of sound sources. These findings demonstrate that speech intelligibility measurements incorporating fluctuating maskers provide potentially relevant information beyond standard assessments and can support a more individualized assessment of hearing loss.

Indexed as

Hearing LossNoisePerceptual MaskingPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSpeech IntelligibilitySpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAudiometry, SpeechAuditory ThresholdCase-Control StudiesFemaleHearing AidsHumansamplificationdip listeningspatial release from maskingspeech recognition

Identifiers

PMID42389812
PMCPMC13329021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.