Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389792›Full record

ReviewMaternal & child nutrition2026

Integrating Mindful Feeding Into Responsive Feeding Guidance.

Kristen Davis, Rachel Razza, Lynn Brann, Gabriel Merrin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal & child nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kristen DavisDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Rachel RazzaDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-9505
Lynn BrannDepartment of Nutrition and Food Studies, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Gabriel MerrinDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responsive feeding is widely recognized as a best practice in infant and young child feeding, yet the gap between its recommendation and its consistent implementation among caregivers remains a persistent challenge. Mindful feeding, which is defined as present-centered mental and emotional awareness in the feeding context, has emerged as a related but distinct construct that may help explain this gap. While research on mindful feeding is still developing, early evidence suggests it is associated with similar positive outcomes for child nutrition and development as responsive feeding, including improved diet quality and decreased negative mealtime behaviors. This Perspective argues that mindful feeding may function as a promising adjunct to support the intrapersonal conditions that facilitate responsive feeding. By cultivating awareness, emotional regulation, and nonjudgmental receptivity, caregivers may be better equipped to perceive and appropriately respond to children's hunger and satiety cues. Drawing on a comparison of definitions, theoretical frameworks, and measurement tools, we propose that mindful feeding be considered for integration into infant and young child feeding guidance and interventions alongside responsive feeding and identify priorities for research needed to support this integration.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorMindfulnessChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaParentingcaregiver feeding practicesearly childhoodinfant and young child feedingmindful feedingobesity preventionparenting self‐efficacyresponsive feedingself‐regulation

Identifiers

PMID42389792
PMCPMC13324808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.