Observational studyCirculation. Population health and outcomes2026
Bleeding Risk With Apixaban Versus Rivaroxaban: A Reference Trial Emulation Predicting the Results of COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF Using US Health Care Claims.
Observational study in Circulation. Population health and outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prediction of the COBRRA AF Anticoagulant Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
Prediction of the COBRRA VTE Anticoagulant Trial in Healthcare Claims Data
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants such as apixaban and rivaroxaban, have transformed the management of thromboembolic disorders. Randomized controlled trials were initiated in 2017 (COBRRA-VTE [Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism]) and 2021 (COBRRA-AF [Comparison of Bleeding Risk Between Rivaroxaban and Apixaban in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation]) to directly compare apixaban and rivaroxaban on the risk of bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and atrial fibrillation (AF). We aimed to emulate the design and measurements of these ongoing trials and use US health care insurance claims data to predict their findings.
methodsIn cohort studies designed to emulate COBRRA-VTE (REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05264168) and COBRRA-AF (NCT05256797) in 3 US health care insurance claims databases (Medicare, Optum Clinformatics, Merative MarketScan), the risk of bleeding with apixaban was evaluated relative to the risk with rivaroxaban. Pretreatment confounding factors were adjusted for via 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was a composite of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (defined using
resultsIn the COBRRA-VTE emulation (N=14 023 matched pairs, mean age=67 years, 55% women), we observed a 31% decreased risk of bleeding for apixaban compared with rivaroxaban (incidence rate per 100 person-years: apixaban, 12.8; rivaroxaban, 19.1; hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.59-0.79]). For the COBRRA-AF emulation (N=176 990 matched pairs, mean age=74 years, 50% women), we similarly observed a 31% decreased risk for apixaban compared with rivaroxaban (incidence rate per 100 person-years: apixaban, 6.4; rivaroxaban, 9.2; hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.71]).
conclusionsIn database studies that closely emulated the design and measurements of the COBRRA-VTE and COBRRA-AF trials, a substantially lower risk of bleeding with apixaban was observed, consistent with the results of COBRRA-VTE (published after completion of our analyses), and indirect comparisons from other trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.