ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2026
Implant geometry as a patient-specific identifier in breast brachytherapy: leveraging electromagnetic tracking to prevent treatment mix-ups.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Patient or treatment plan mix-ups are among the most serious patient-specific human errors in brachytherapy. However, many brachytherapy departments rely only on review by a second, independent person, which does not eliminate the risk of human failure. In this work, we developed and retrospectively evaluated an automated patient identification method based solely on the geometry of the interstitial implant in breast cancer patients. Materials and methods: The implant geometry is assessed using an electromagnetic tracking (EMT) system that provides real-time positional data of each catheter with sub-millimetre accuracy. The measured implant geometry is rigidly registered to the CT-based implant geometry associated with the clinical treatment plan. To quantitatively compare them, a similarity metric based on a distance-to-agreement (DTA) criterion (3-10 mm) and a pass rate threshold (50-95%) was used. The implants of 80 patients were included in the evaluation, resulting in 6400 patient-treatment plan combinations. Results: The classifier reliably identified patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve close to 1, highlighting an overall excellent discriminative performance. At the optimal decision threshold under the requirement of a false positive rate of 0%, it achieved a sensitivity between 94.8% and 97.5% depending on the DTA and pass rate thresholds, and an overall accuracy of 99.9%. Conclusion: Interstitial implants in breast brachytherapy are virtually unique, so determining their geometry prior to each fraction is a viable option for patient identification. The EMT-based automated technique has proven to be effective in detecting patient or treatment plan mix-ups with near-perfect accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.