Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in ophthalmology2026

Confidence in managing open-globe injuries and endophthalmitis: a pre- and postwet-lab training evaluation.

Vegard Asgeir Forsaa, Birger Lindtjørn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vegard Asgeir ForsaaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Birger LindtjørnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 2 days of wet-lab training on confidence in the management of open-globe injury (OGI) and endophthalmitis. Methods: In a porcine wet lab, 24 participants were trained on 12 surgical tasks, including pars plana vitreous sampling and corneal and scleral suturing. Participants anonymously rated their confidence in managing OGI and endophthalmitis on a scale from 1 to 10 before the course, immediately after its completion, and 6 months later. Results: Confidence in corneal suturing improved from a median of 1 (interquartile range [IQR] = 1) to 7 (IQR = 3) immediately after the course ( Conclusions: Wet-lab training effectively increased participants' confidence in managing OGI. Key elements of the ophthalmic surgeon's learning curve can be addressed in a porcine wet lab, thereby reducing the risk of poor patient outcomes. Six months later, the positive effect on confidence remained significant, despite the expected decline over time. Nonetheless, there remains scope for further improvement in these essential surgical skills.

Indexed as

active learningcorneal penetrationendophthalmitisocular traumaopenglobe injurypenetrating eye traumaporcine labwet lab

Identifiers

PMID42389710
PMCPMC13318718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.