ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2026
Diplomatic roles of regional coordinators for WHO Member States.
Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the coordination functions, decision-making processes and consensus-building strategies of World Health Organization (WHO) regional coordinators of Member States in Geneva within the WHO's federal governance structure. Methods: In this qualitative study, we interviewed 12 current and former regional coordinators from five WHO regions (African, the Americas, South-East Asia, European and Eastern Mediterranean) using a semi-structured questionnaire. A regional coordinator from the Western Pacific Region later provided a written response to the questionnaire which we report separately due to methodological and time differences. We analysed the data using a hybrid thematic approach combining initial coding assisted by artificial intelligence with our rigorous interpretive validation. Findings: We identified eight main coordination functions. Core liaison and information-sharing were functions undertaken by regional coordinators in all the regions, while position development and meeting organization were undertaken by regional coordinators in most regions. Coordination complexity and consensus-building strategies, such as bilateral mediation and issue reframing, varied depending on regional political dynamics and institutional capacities. A formal job description and procedural handbooks were lacking, and therefore the regional coordinator role was a negotiated practice dependent on informal knowledge transfer. Conclusion: Regional coordinators serve as boundary-spanners linking regional autonomous governance with global health governance. To address the absence of documented institutional knowledge, we propose developing formal induction curricula, cross-regional mentorship pairing and harmonized procedural handbooks. These measures will strengthen regional voices and ensure more inclusive participation in global health diplomacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.