ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Retrospective cohort study assessing cardiovascular risk reduction through intensive blood pressure management in high-risk patients.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension remains a major global risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While clinical trials suggest that lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels reduce cardiovascular risk, real-world data from high-risk patients remain limited. This study evaluated the association between achieved SBP levels and cardiovascular outcomes in a high-risk hypertensive population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study from January 2022 to December 2024, including 180 high-risk hypertensive patients receiving treatment at a tertiary care facility. Patients were categorized based on achieved systolic blood pressure during follow-up: one group with SBP <120 mmHg and another with SBP between 130 and 139 mmHg. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and cardiovascular-related death or hospitalization. The secondary outcomes consisted of all-cause mortality and adverse treatment events. Results: Patients in the lower achieved SBP group had significantly fewer MACE events over a median follow-up of 18 months compared with those in the higher SBP group (14.8 vs. 26.5, Conclusion: Among high-risk hypertensive patients, lower achieved SBP levels were associated with reduced cardiovascular event rates. These findings support the need for further prospective studies to define optimal BP targets, especially in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.