Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Multimodal fusion of EHR and ECG based on deep learning for predicting new-onset coronary heart disease in cancer patients.

Sheng Zhang, Wei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sheng ZhangKey Laboratory of Digital-Intelligent Disease Surveillance and Health Governance, North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Cardiology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients carry elevated risk of new-onset coronary heart disease (CHD), but accurate risk stratification remains limited. We aimed to develop a multimodal deep learning model for predicting new-onset CHD in cancer patients. Methods: Consecutive cancer patients from January 2010 to December 2020 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was new-onset CHD during hospitalization or follow-up. We constructed a hybrid CNN-LSTM model by fusing electronic health records (EHRs) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Model performance was compared with seven machine learning methods (LR, DT, KNN, SVM, RF, AdaBoost, GBDT). Clinical utility and calibration were assessed by ROC, decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted in early-stage (Stage II) and late-stage (Stage III + IV) cohorts. Results: A total of 1262 patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 722 (57.2%) developed new-onset CHD, with 696 (55.2%) classified as early-stage (Stage II). The CNN-LSTM model achieved an AUC of 0.975 (95%CI: 0.962-0.988), outperforming seven conventional machine learning models. In subgroup analysis, the model yielded an AUC of 0.924 in early-stage patients and 0.888 in late-stage patients. SHAP analysis identified that PAB, CRP, age, cTnI, PT, and ECG markers including HR, QT and QTc intervals were the strongest predictive features. Conclusion: The multimodal CNN-LSTM model enables robust and interpretable prediction of new-onset CHD in cancer patients. Coagulation, myocardial injury, inflammatory, metabolic, and electrophysiological markers provide mechanistic insights and may facilitate early cardioprotective strategies.

Indexed as

cancercoronary heart diseasedeep learningelectrocardiogrammultimodal fusion

Identifiers

PMID42389632
PMCPMC13318621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.