Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389618›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2026

Is the 360 Degree Turn Test a Safe and Reliable Tool for Post-Stroke Tele-Assessment?

Bruna Nascimento Zanfir da Silva, Camila Pinto, Caroline Santos Figueiredo, Thainara Cruz da Rosa, Katherine Lee Hsieh, Aline Souza Pagnussat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bruna Nascimento Zanfir da SilvaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0548-9178
Camila PintoMovement Analysis and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0675-0147
Caroline Santos FigueiredoGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-9913
Thainara Cruz da RosaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8727-7904
Katherine Lee HsiehDepartment of Physical Therapy, Georgia State University (GSU), Atlanta, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2005-4519
Aline Souza PagnussatGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the growing use of telehealth in stroke rehabilitation, it remains unclear whether online assessments can match the accuracy of in-person evaluations. Purpose: To investigate the safety and reliability of tele-assessment using the 360 Degree Turn Test in individuals with chronic stroke under controlled conditions. Methods: Twenty-five individuals with chronic stroke were assessed both in person and via synchronous tele-assessment with a 24-48-hour interval. Online assessments were conducted via video call by a trained physiotherapist. One month later, the same physiotherapist and a second physiotherapist scored the recorded assessments asynchronously. Results: There was a high level of agreement between in-person and tele-assessment (ICC > 0.90). Tele-assessment demonstrated excellent intra- and inter-rater reliability. However, participants took significantly longer to complete the test during tele-assessment (p < 0.05). No adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Tele-assessment using the 360 Degree Turn Test demonstrated high reliability and appeared to be safe under the specific conditions tested (i.e., chronic participants, caregiver presence, and controlled environment). However, performance outcomes obtained via tele-assessment may not be directly comparable to in-person assessments in longitudinal follow-up.

Indexed as

ReliabilityStrokeTele-assessmentTelehealthTelemonitoringTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42389618
PMCPMC13321844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.