Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42389599›Full record

ReviewiScience2026

Interdisciplinary perspectives on multi-risk anticipatory action.

Tesse A de Boer, Alessia Matanó, Evan Easton-Calabria, Tilly Alcayna, Mirianna Budimir, Marleen C de Ruiter, Madeline Ewbank, Muhammad Fawwad, Debora Gonzalez, Catalina Jaime and 14 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Tesse A de BoerRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Alessia MatanóInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Evan Easton-CalabriaRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Tilly AlcaynaRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Mirianna BudimirPractical Action, Rugby CV21 2SD, UK.
Marleen C de RuiterInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Madeline EwbankRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Muhammad FawwadWelthungerhilfe Anticipatory Humanitarian Action Facility (WAHAFA), Welthungerhilfe, Bonn 53173, Germany.
Debora GonzalezAktion gegen den Hunger (ACF), Berlin 53173, Germany.
Catalina JaimeRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Lindsey JonesLondon School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK.
Kim KristensenFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Subregional Office for Eastern Africa, United Nations Office at Nairobi, Nairobi 00200, Kenya.
Brenda LazarusFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Subregional Office for Eastern Africa, United Nations Office at Nairobi, Nairobi 00200, Kenya.
Rodrigo MenaThe Hague Humanitarian Studies Centre, Institute of Social Studies (ISS) of Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Hague 2502 LT, the Netherlands.
Edward ParkinsonStart Network, London EC1V 9DD, UK.
Robert Šakić TrogrlićSystemic Risk and Resilience, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg 2361, Austria.
Beth SimonsWelthungerhilfe Anticipatory Humanitarian Action Facility (WAHAFA), Welthungerhilfe, Bonn 53173, Germany.
Timothy TiggelovenInstitute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marc J C van den HombergFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7522 NH, the Netherlands.
Cees J van WestenFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede 7522 NH, the Netherlands.
Martha M VogelRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.
Andy WheatleyInternational Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), Geneva 1202, Switzerland.
Christopher J WhiteDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK.
Andrew KruczkiewiczRed Cross Red Crescent Climate Centre, 2593 HT The Hague, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anticipatory action (AA) has transformed how humanitarian actors respond to forecasted crises, yet most systems remain built around single hazards. This perspective argues that to stay effective in a world where climate, conflict, and economic shocks increasingly intersect, AA must evolve toward a multi-risk approach. Drawing on a review of 105 active frameworks in 2023 and 154 in 2024 from the Anticipation Hub's 2024 and 2025 global overview reports, expert consultations, and 17 interviews, we examine how practitioners and scientists are beginning to bridge this gap. Emerging innovations-such as multi-risk analysis informing AA design, scenario-based triggers, conflict-sensitive planning, and adaptive financing-offer promising pathways, but current systems still struggle to capture dynamic vulnerabilities and interactions between risks. Advancing AA will require embracing uncertainty and redesigning systems to learn, adapt, and act across interconnected risks-moving from anticipating single hazards to anticipating intersected crises.

Indexed as

hazard communicationinterdisciplinary application studiessocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID42389599
PMCPMC13320268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.